Chipp.in Tech News and Reviews

Windows, Security & Privacy, Open Source and more

Menu
  • Home
  • Windows
  • Security & Privacy
  • Gaming
  • Guides
  • Windows 11 Book
  • Contact
  • RSS Feed
Menu

Category: Software

The Microsoft Download Center Archive website

Need old Microsoft downloads? There is an archive for that!

Posted on December 9, 2025December 9, 2025 by Martin Brinkmann

Microsoft has accumulated a wealth of downloads over the last four decades or so. From tools and drivers to Windows versions and standalone applications. While some may not be useful anymore at this day and age, other than for a nostalgic look back at how things were back in the good old days, others are still useful.

However, Microsoft is pruning its archives regularly. Means, downloads may be removed and it is becoming increasingly difficult to find them. While third-party sites may offer them, some may add a pinch of malware on top of the downloads, which is a problem especially for inexperienced users or users in a hurry.

Enter the Microsoft Download Center Archive. It is a free site that offers legacy downloads for Microsoft products. You find downloads between the years 2012 and 2025 in the archive, which Microsoft deleted from its own archives.

Here is a glimpse of what you can expect:

  • PowerToys and Fun Packs for Windows XP.
  • Office Viewers like Word Viewer 2003 or Visio Viewer 2016.
  • Old .NET Framework versions.
  • Microsoft Visual C++ and Visual Basic Redistributables.
  • Windows Help.
  • Microsoft Report Viewer.
  • And much more.

While the focus is on downloads for older versions of Windows, at least some of the downloads are also compatible with Windows 10 or Windows 11. Furthermore, since Windows 10 is near the end of its support, it is possible that Microsoft is going to remove downloads for Windows 10 in the near future.

These will also be added to the archive then, making it a great resource for users who plan to stick to Windows 10.

The site offers a search and a list of common downloads. You can type the name of an operating system to get all downloads for it, or search for the name of a software or tool instead.

Downloads are hosted at the Internet Archive. They start instantly and do not require an account.

Closing Words

The unofficial Microsoft Download Center Archive is a useful website for Windows users who want to download software that Microsoft removed from its official websites.

Windows 11

Dell: 500 million Windows 10 PCs can’t upgrade to Windows 11

Posted on November 27, 2025 by Martin Brinkmann

How is the last supported Windows operating system doing after Microsoft ended support for its predecessor Windows 10 a month ago? Not so good, at least according to Dell CEO Jeffrey Clarke.

Clarke revealed several information during the company’s latest earnings call. One of them being that Dell believes that there are 500 million Windows 10 PCs out there in the world that can’t be upgraded to Windows 11 officially. While most could be upgraded by bypassing Microsoft’s artificially introduced system requirements, only a small fraction will because of the technical process that is involved and the consequences.

Another 500 million PCs that run Windows 10 can be upgraded, but have not yet. That leaves about 500 million PCs that run Windows 11 already, according to Dell.

However, this is not the only bombshell that Clarke dropped during the call. He also revealed that the transition from Windows 10 to Windows 11 is much slower than the transition from Windows 8 to Windows 10.

The transition is lagging behind, which affects Dell’s growth in the sector. Dell reported a revenue of $12.1 billion for its Client Solutions Group, which bundles commercial client and consumer PC sales. Here, Dell reported a slight uptick in commercial client revenue to $10.1 billion and a declining revenue of $2 billion in consumer PCs.

The Infrastructure Solutions Group made more than up for that though. Its revenue was $14.1 billion, which is a 24 percent increase compared to the last year and the sevenths consecutive quarter with double-digit growth. AI is the main driver of the revenue increase of this group.

To sum it up: Windows 10 users seem to hold on to their PCs, even if they could upgrade them to Windows 10. For now, PCs remain supported with security updates if ESU is enabled for the device.

Now You: Windows 10 or Windows 11, what is your preference? Or something else? Maybe you made the switch to Linux already?

Windows 11 is removing an option to bypass Microsoft account and internet during setup

How Windows 11’s Point-in-time Restore feature differs from System Restore

Posted on November 25, 2025November 25, 2025 by Martin Brinkmann

You may have heard that Microsoft is working on a new restore feature for Windows 11 called Point-in-time Restore.

The backup feature in a sentence: It allows Windows admins to restore the exact previous state of a Windows PC.

The main focus is to offer fast restores to a previous system state to allow the quickest recovery possible using integrated options.

The biggest different to System Restore, therefore, is that it creates a snapshot of the entire Windows system and not just some files and setting, like System Restore.

While that sounds like a great addition to Windows and could make some backup apps unnecessary, this is not the case entirely, as there are downsides to this as well.

Probably the biggest letdown is that it is capped to 72 hours. Means, it won’t help if the issue occurred before that period and was not noticed until then. Microsoft says that this is the maximum and that restore states will be deleted after being kept for the maximum.

The restore points may also be deleted in other circumstances, mostly when storage that is reserved for the restoration feature is reaching the set maximum size or when the device itself is running low on disk space.

Windows 11 creates a restore point every 24 hours by default. Here is a table that shows the main differences between Point-in-time Restore and System Restore, according to Microsoft.

CriteriaPoint-in-time restoreSystem Restore
ConfigurationSystem settingsControl panel
Restore point triggerScheduled frequency (automatic only)Event-triggered or manual
RetentionMax 72 hours per restore pointIndefinite (subject to disk usage/cleanup)
Target scopeFull system stateSystem files and settings; app/user data coverage varies
ManagementWill support remote management*No modern management

Good news is that Point-in-time restore runs locally and while you do need to make sure that enough storage space is available, it could finally be a Windows feature that most Windows 11 users have nothing against.

However, it won’t replace traditional backup software, as these allow you to keep copies indefinitely, something that Point-in-time Restore does not seem to support and probably won’t ever.

Google Drive is now available for Windows on ARM PCs

“We know we have work to do”: Microsoft posts apology, but gets destroyed in the responses

Posted on November 16, 2025November 16, 2025 by Martin Brinkmann

Microsoft’s plan to turn Windows into an agentic operating system has been met with massive backlash online. When the Microsoft President of the Windows and Devices division announced the next Microsoft Ignite developer and professionals conference, AI made up the cornerstone of the announcement.

Windows is evolving into an agentic OS, connecting devices, cloud, and AI to unlock intelligent productivity and secure work anywhere. Join us at #MSIgnite to see how frontier firms are transforming with Windows and what’s next for the platform. We can’t wait to show you!

Users responded in droves and the general tone was very negative. Many asked Microsoft to focus on the features and things that matter, like creating a stable operating system that offers top-tier performance.

The chief of Microsoft’s Windows division limited comments, which drove the discussion elsewhere, but did not seem to turn it down.

Then, after a few days, Davuluri published a reply on Twitter to one developer comment in particular. In the command, Gergely Orosz stated that he could not see any reason for software engineers to pick Windows “with this weird direction they are doubling down on” and an operating system that “doesn’t look like anything a builder who wants OS control could choose”.

In the reply, Davuluri claimed that Microsoft was being swarmed by feedback and that Microsoft was listening and that Microsoft cares deeply about developers.

We know we have work to do on the experience, both on the everyday usability, from inconsistent dialogs to power user experiences. When we meet as a team, we discuss these paint points and others in detail, because we want developers to choose Windows.

We know words aren’t enough, it’s on us to continue improving and shipping

This time, the comments were as brutal as the first time. X user JimBobSquarePant’s comment is representative for the general tone of replies.

It really is hard to believe that to be the case given the disconnect displayed in your previous post upon which you received overwhelmingly negative feedback.

I’ve been a Windows user since I was a small child, I’m a Microsoft MVP and develop almost exclusively on Windows but even I am considering Linux as an alternative. The quality of the software of the OS (and other Microsoft products) is in real, visible decline.

In short, commenters complained that the quality of the Windows operating system is deteriorating, and that Microsoft is not listening nor caring about developers or power users anymore.

Closing Words

Judging from the past ten or so years of Windows development, and especially the past couple of years, I’d be surprised if Microsoft would actually start listening and change course, or at least focus more development resources on improving the stability and performance of the Windows operating system.

What about you? Feel free to leave a comment below.

Android

Android is getting an option for experts for sideloading

Posted on November 13, 2025November 13, 2025 by Martin Brinkmann

Google announced plans earlier this year to change a fundamental cornerstone of the Android ecosystem: sideloading. The plan was to force all developers to verify their identity, even those who had no interest in publishing via the Google Play Store.

This was a stark change compared to the status quo. Currently, developers may choose to publish their apps outside Google Play, for instance only on F-Droid, and they can do so unhindered.

Under the new system, they would be forced to verify their identity. Google says that this is for improving security, while third-party stores like F-Droid claim that it is the end of sideloading as we know it.

The main issue, from F-Droid’s perspective, is that Google is dishonest when it states that sideloading is not going away on Android. The reasoning is simple: the definition of sideloading is “the transfer of apps form web sources that are not vendor-approved”. Under the new system, developers need to register an account with Google, pay a fee, provide verification, e.g. with government IDs, accept the terms and conditions, and more.

Google published an update to its plans today on the Android Developers Blog. There, Google explained why it is introducing verification in first place (to keep users safe).

However, Google says that it has listened to feedback and decided to integrate an option for experienced users, students, hobbyists and developers.

It says that it is building “a new advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn’t verified”. This new flow is designed to ensure that users cannot be forced to bypass the safety checks, even when under pressure from scammers.

Additionally, Google wants to display clear warnings to help users understand the risks involved.

How this is going to work is unclear at this point. Google says that it will share more details in the coming months about this new option.

Still, it could be a good compromise that allows developers and users to install apps from other sources, even if they are not verified by Google.

Now it is your turn. What is your take on this? Is it a good compromise or would you like to see something else entirely? Feel free to leave a comment down below.

Windows 11 is removing an option to bypass Microsoft account and internet during setup

Not again! Microsoft confirms another Bitlocker Recovery issue in Windows

Posted on November 5, 2025 by Martin Brinkmann

Windows users who use BitLocker to encrypt their data either willingly or unknowingly may have run into a BitLocker related issue several times in the past.

It is unclear when it all started, but the essence of the bug was always the same: affected Windows PCs would boot into BitLocker Recovery Mode after installation of an update that caused the issue.

The problem here is that to get out of the mode, users needed the recovery key, which many probably did not really know. While it is easy to look it up online, at least when a user uses a Microsoft account to sign in, it still was a hassle in the best case.

Microsoft confirmed another BitLocker Recovery issue on the Microsoft 365 admin center, but not yet as a known issue for regular users who do not have access to the admin portal.

The issue affects the following Windows versions:

  • Windows 10, version 22H2
  • Windows 11, version 24H2
  • Windows 11, version 25H2

The systems are affected, if the October 2025 security updates are installed on the machines.

Microsoft says that the issue affects Windows PCs with Intel processors and Modern Standby mostly. Still, other systems may also be affected.

As usually, Windows users may resolve the issue by entering the BitLocker recovery key when prompted for it.

Closing Words

Microsoft seems to have a hard time fixing the BitLocker bug for good, as it reappeared several times, including in May of 2025 when Microsoft issued another warning about the problem.

Windows 11: Block Windows Search from sending anything to Bing

Posted on November 3, 2025November 3, 2025 by Martin Brinkmann

The integration of Microsoft Bing, or any other online search tool for that matter, in Windows Search is an abomination. The main idea is to run a search online if Windows can’t find anything locally or at least give you the option to run the search.

I’d argue that the vast majority of Windows users does not want this. When you run a search locally, you expect local results. Also, a web browser is just a click away and the more appropriate vessel for running searches online.

Recently I noticed that if you are too fast when the system boots, your searches may end up opening Bing in Microsoft Edge, even if there is a local match. It happens only when you open Start right after the system has booted, start typing and press the Enter-key.

Anyway, it is highly recommended to block Bing entirely in Windows Search, unless you are one of the few users who finds this useful actually (I have yet to meet a single user who does though, let me know..).

Here is how you can end Bing in Windows Search in a matter of seconds (thanks Henk):

  1. Open the Start menu on the Windows machine.
  2. Type Powershell.
  3. Select “run as administrator” to open an elevated PowerShell window.
  4. Paste the following code: Set-ItemProperty -Path “HKCU:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Search” -Name “BingSearchEnabled” -Value 0 -Type DWord
  5. Press the Enter-key to run it.

That is all there is to it. In case you wonder, this adds the Dword BingSearchEnabled to the Registry. Note that you can add the information manually as well using the Registry Editor, or create a Registry file if you prefer that way.

You can undo the change at any time by setting the value to 1 or deleting the key. I doubt anyone would, but it may happen that Microsoft accidentally resets this. You will notice right away though, as searches may include online content in that case again.

Now You: Do you use the online search feature of Windows Search? Or do you disable it / ignore it instead? Feel free to leave a comment down below.

Greenshot: open source screen capturing app is now also available as a portable version

Posted on November 1, 2025November 1, 2025 by Martin Brinkmann

There is certainly no shortage of options when it comes to capturing screenshots or videos on computer systems. From built-in solutions like Microsoft’s Snipping Tool to excellent third-party apps like my favorite PicPick.

Greenshot is another household name. The open source application has been around for a long time and it is well maintained. It supports various types of screenshot captures, from full screen over windowed to region captures.

While it does lack some of the advanced options, like capturing video or scrolling windows in most programs, it does support a few extras like excellent support for integrating third-party services like Flickr or Dropbox. Other features that it supports include adding annotations and highlights, obfuscating parts of the screenshot, and more.

Greenshot interface

The developer of Greenshot Christian Schulz released a new version of the application just a few days ago. It includes a single fix for file associations not working when the app is running already and a new feature: a portable version.

Good news is that you can run Greenshot now from any location using the portable version. You can put it on a USB flash drive or stick and carry it with you around to use it on any Windows machine you plug the USB device in.

So, if you are using Greenshot already you might switch to the portable version, if you prefer it. You can download the portable version, or the setup version, of Greenshot from its GitHub repository.

Now You: which screenshot tool or tools do you use and why? Feel free to leave your recommendation in the comment section below.

Microsoft announces plan to simplify Windows Update titles

Posted on October 30, 2025October 31, 2025 by Martin Brinkmann

Microsoft announced an upcoming change regarding the titles of Windows Update. Going forward, Microsoft wants to simplify the name of updates so that they are “more intuitive, consistent, and informative”.

The company hopes that this change will make it easier for regular users to understand what an update does that is installing or was installed on the Windows device. Original equipment manufacturers and partners should benefit from this as well, according to Microsoft.

The updated titles follow a simple structure and will focus on the name of the update. Most updates, the exception is a driver update, include the KB ID as before. Windows Updates include the build number furthermore, while drivers the version of the driver.

An example of an update with a new title. Source: Microsoft

Microsoft posted several examples of how driver updates will be named in the future:

  • Monthly or out-of-band security updates: Security Update (KB5034123) (26100.4747)
  • Monthly preview non-security updates: Preview Update (KB5062660) (26100.4770)
  • .NET Framework security updates: .NET Framework Security Update (KB5056579)
  • .NET Framework non-security updates: .NET Framework Preview Update (KB5056579)
  • Driver updates: Logitech Driver Update (123.331.1.0)
  • AI component updates: Phi Silica AI Component Update (KB5064650) (1.2507.793.0)

Generally speaking, the new titles apply to Windows operating system updates, such as monthly cumulative updates, .NET Framework updates, driver updates, AI component updates, and Visual Studio updates.

Windows users will find the new titles under Settings > Windows Update and also in the update history, which can be accessed from the Windows Update page of the Settings. Lastly, it is also shown on the Windows release health website.

Microsoft says that updates that do get deployed via WSUS (Windows Server Update Services) or the Microsoft Update Catalog, won’t reflect the changed titles for the most part. Windows feature update titles will also keep the traditional title.

The new titles may omit the version of Windows the update is for. While that may not affect regular users who install the update on their devices, it could affect users who want a quick overview of the released updates on Microsoft’s website or elsewhere.

Now You: What is your take on this change? Is it for the better?

Who is going to talk to their PC, once Microsoft launches Copilot Voice for Windows?

Posted on October 21, 2025October 21, 2025 by Martin Brinkmann

The main future of PC that Microsoft envisions is giving Windows users more flexibility when it comes to interacting with the PC. Instead of using mouse and keyboard, Microsoft is betting big on AI and the recently announced Copilot Voice feature.

In simple terms, it allows anyone, Microsoft says even users with no-Copilot+ PCs, to talk to the AI using a connected microphone. This allows Windows users to use their voice for searching, getting help, or automating tasks, according to Microsoft.

Many news outlet made it appear that Microsoft wants Windows users to use their voice exclusively when they use the PC. This is not the case, but Microsoft believes that voice will play a much larger role in the future.

There are several uncertainties here, largely because Microsoft did not provide many details on the functionality. Tests have to show how well, or not, the voice feature works and what you can do with it.

  • Is it just for communicating with the AI via voice?
  • Can you use it for other purposes, e.g., dictation?
  • What are the privacy implications? Where is the voice data processed? Is it stored? If so, for how long? Who has access to the data?

Who is going to talk to their PC?

Assuming that the feature works well, the question about who is going to use it needs to be answered as well.

Voice interactions can be beneficial in some contexts, for instance if you need to use your hands for something else, or use a fullscreen app and do not want to switch to the text-based prompt.

However, voice does not work well in some contexts. Imagine talking to your Windows PC during your commute, or in an office with other workers sitting nearby.

The idea of a Star Trek-like communication with a computer system works well, if there is only one person talking to it. Now imagine the whole Enterprise-crew talking to the computer at the same time in the command room. That is utter chaos.

So, this voice feature will be used in private for the most part, which excludes some business use. Still, Microsoft says it is another option that Windows users have, and that is fine, provided that you want to communicate with the AI.

What is your take on this? Do you see yourself talking to an AI in the coming years?

  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • …
  • 33
  • Next

Support This Site

If you like what I do please support me!

Any tip is appreciated. Thanks!
  • April 16, 2026 by Martin Brinkmann Windows 11 Context Menu Manager: remove items with a click
  • April 15, 2026 by Martin Brinkmann One Exploited Zero-Day and Record Numbers: The April 2026 Windows Patch Tuesday Breakdown
  • April 14, 2026 by Martin Brinkmann Brave is getting Container support and the feature has made a big jump recently
  • April 13, 2026 by Martin Brinkmann A More User-Friendly Way to Pause Windows 11 Updates is Coming
  • April 11, 2026 by Martin Brinkmann Microsoft is Radically Changing the Windows Insider Program

About

We talk, write and dream about Technology 24/7 here at Chipp.in. The site, created by Martin Brinkmann in 2023, focuses on well-researched tech news, reviews, guides, help and more.

Legal Notice

Our commitment

Many websites write about tech, but chipp.in is special in several ways. All of our guides are unique, and we will never just rehash news that you find elsewhere.

Read the About page for additional information on the site and its founder and author.

Support Us

We don't run advertisement on this site that tracks users. If you see ads, they are static links. Ads, including affiliate links, never affect our writing on this site.

Here is a link to our privacy policy

©2026 Chipp.in Tech News and Reviews